We scan public GitHub Issues for recurring requests, workflow friction and missing capabilities—then rank the strongest signals without hiding the original evidence.
27 signals · Last data refresh Sep 6, 2026, 12:05 PM UTC
ISSUE SCAN COVERAGE8 / 36 repositories
Issue evidence is collected on a rotating schedule. Coverage grows with each six-hour refresh, and a repository can be fully scanned even when no qualifying demand signal is found.
Evidence signal, not proof of market demand.
A popular Issue can reveal real friction, but it does not prove willingness to pay. Use these leads for interviews, validation and product discovery.
FROM SIGNAL TO ACTION
A 3-step validation sprint
Use the evidence as a starting point, then verify the problem before building.
1. Read the threadIdentify who has the problem and the workaround they use today.
2. Contact five usersAsk about frequency, cost and what they already tried.
3. Test one narrow fixOffer a manual or lightweight solution before writing a full product.
The evidence score combines Issue comments, positive reactions, unresolved duration and the underlying project’s Radar Score. Maintenance-only tickets, dependency dashboards, CI failures and release checklists are filtered out. Rankings are independent and never paid placements.