Product Capability workflows
This workflow friction appears across 2 independent open-source repositories. Repetition raises confidence, but direct user validation still decides whether it is worth building.
Where this need appears
Each item below is a public, qualified GitHub discussion. The Radar groups related friction, while the original Issue remains available for source checking.
- [Feature Request] Run pre/post hooks on continue_run + AgentOS-level global Agent/Team run hooksagno-agi/agno · 16 comments · 0 positive reactions
- [Enhancement]: Is this pentagi is capable of automate internal penetration testing with adversary attacking planvxcontrol/pentagi · 3 comments · 0 positive reactions
- [Enhancement]: scope of work menuvxcontrol/pentagi · 2 comments · 0 positive reactions
Turn the signal into one observable action
Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.
A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.
Ask before you build
- When did you last need this?
- What outcome were you trying to reach?
- What did you use instead?
- How often does this occur?
- What commitment would prove it matters?
Professional guardrail: Use a fixed test case and compare completion, regressions and recovery against the unchanged baseline.
Choose a narrow next move
Save this pattern in the free workspace, interview someone who recently hit it, and record one concrete commitment or decision. Do not treat issue counts or compliments as willingness to pay.