Multi-user & team routing
This workflow friction appears across 3 independent open-source repositories. Repetition raises confidence, but direct user validation still decides whether it is worth building.
Where this need appears
Each item below is a public, qualified GitHub discussion. The Radar groups related friction, while the original Issue remains available for source checking.
- [Feature]: 最好能支持多用户和后台管理THU-MAIC/OpenMAIC · 4 comments · 1 positive reactions
- [FEAT] For opencode, could we have a option of instead of choosing model for team members, choosing agent for each team members.777genius/agent-teams-ai · 3 comments · 1 positive reactions
- One address, several agents: whoever is nearest answersopenonion/connectonion · 8 comments · 0 positive reactions
Turn the signal into one observable action
Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.
A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.
Ask before you build
- When did you last need this?
- What outcome were you trying to reach?
- What did you use instead?
- How often does this occur?
- What commitment would prove it matters?
Professional guardrail: Measure behavior in the real workflow and keep a human review step for consequential actions.
Choose a narrow next move
Save this pattern in the free workspace, interview someone who recently hit it, and record one concrete commitment or decision. Do not treat issue counts or compliments as willingness to pay.