Write the problem hypothesis
For [operator], the workflow fails during [condition], forcing [recovery work] and costing [time, money or trust].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.Observability: correlation and projection gaps that made the 04.09 audit slow (root_task_id, llm_round location, pacing bound, wave_count, cost 0.0, sidecar errors, progress rotation)
Evidence observed in razzant/ouroboros, a Coding project.
2 comments0 positive reactions4 days openProject Radar 88
bug
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: Facts collected while auditing , , : Terminal events lack ( , , carry while carries it): on shows 59 starts and 54 settles for one tree — five false orphans. also carries only the child id (2 of 17 unread runs in the swarm were never consumed and are invisible from the root). lives only in the task-local headless log…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- Show me the last failure and its logs.
- What triggered it and how often does it recur?
- How do you detect it today?
- What does recovery require?
- What would a safe failure look like?
Run the smallest experiment
Add one narrow guardrail, retry or recovery path around the failing step. Replay three real failure cases and compare recovery time.
The same failure is recovered faster in three real cases without creating a new incident.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.