Write the problem hypothesis
For [team], moving data between [system A] and [system B] requires [manual work], causing [delay or errors].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.Export chart validation from the core package (currently only inside flint-chart-mcp)
Evidence observed in microsoft/flint-chart, a Agent Infrastructure project.
4 comments0 positive reactions17 days openProject Radar 85
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: Use case We embed flint in a host application (an LLM agent that authors and a backend that compiles it) without going through MCP. The validation loop is essential in this setup: the agent submits an input, the host validates it, and precise per-problem errors (unknown chart type, unsupported channel, nonexistent…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- Which systems must exchange data?
- What triggers the handoff?
- Which fields or permissions block it?
- How is it handled today?
- Who owns failures between systems?
Run the smallest experiment
Manually operate or prototype one high-frequency connection for one team before building a general connector.
A user completes the real cross-system workflow twice and asks to keep the connection active.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.