Write the problem hypothesis
For [specific user], completing [job] is difficult because [missing capability], causing [measurable consequence].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.Triage the security-scanning baseline before the 1.7.0 preview
Evidence observed in openonion/connectonion, a Agent Infrastructure project.
14 comments0 positive reactions31 days openProject Radar 88
platformtests
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: Current verified state — 2026-08-23 The historical Alpha.2 snapshot below is no longer current. Fresh GitHub security API readback now reports the following for all three first-party 1.7 repositories: Repository Open secret alerts Open CodeQL alerts Open Dependabot alerts Secret scanning Push protection --- ---: ---:…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- When did you last need this?
- What outcome were you trying to reach?
- What did you use instead?
- How often does this occur?
- What commitment would prove it matters?
Run the smallest experiment
Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.
A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.