Write the problem hypothesis
For [specific user], completing [job] is difficult because [missing capability], causing [measurable consequence].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.feat: 本地运行模式、Gemini/Codex 适配器、i18n 国际化、定时启动及项目管理增强
Evidence observed in oritera/Cairn, a Security project.
1 comments7 positive reactions119 days openProject Radar 85
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: 概述 以下是在 Cairn fork 版本中开发的一系列功能增强，分享给上游以供参考，欢迎讨论是否有合并的价值。 --- 新增功能 1. 本地运行模式（无需 Docker） 新增 ，作为 的无 Docker 替代方案。Worker 直接通过 subprocess 在宿主机上运行，通过 中的 启用。 使用原生 Python 超时处理（无需 GNU timeout） 与 ContainerManager 保持相同的文件写入契约，任务代码兼容 适合无 Docker 的开发/测试环境 2. 简化 Worker 适配器 重构了 Claude Code 和 Codex 适配器，直接使用本地已认证的 CLI，无需在配置中填写 API Key 或…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- When did you last need this?
- What outcome were you trying to reach?
- What did you use instead?
- How often does this occur?
- What commitment would prove it matters?
Run the smallest experiment
Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.
A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.