Write the problem hypothesis
For [developer], completing [setup or development task] is unclear at [step], causing [abandonment or rework].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.Multi-runtime agent SDK abstraction (Claude + Codex + local models)
Evidence observed in nanocoai/nanoclaw, a Coding project.
6 comments3 positive reactions158 days openProject Radar 95
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: I've built a multi-runtime abstraction layer on top of NanoClaw that allows different agent SDKs to be installed as modular skills — mirroring the existing channel pattern ( , ). What it does AgentRuntime interface at the host level — the app calls instead of directly Modular SDK registry — SDKs self-register via ,…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- Screen-share the task without guidance.
- Where do you first hesitate?
- What did you search for?
- Which error or concept is unclear?
- What workaround finally unblocked you?
Run the smallest experiment
Create the smallest example, diagnostic or setup assistant and observe three developers using it unprompted.
Three developers finish the task with fewer interventions or measurably less time.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.