Write the problem hypothesis
For [developer], completing [setup or development task] is unclear at [step], causing [abandonment or rework].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.Use OpenCode (and its JS SDK) instead/parallel with Claude Code (and its Agents SDK)
Evidence observed in nanocoai/nanoclaw, a Coding project.
5 comments4 positive reactions179 days openProject Radar 95
kind/questionpriority/low
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: Is it under consideration to evolve beyond Claude Code, potentially with OpenCode, to support any AI provider? Claude Code is the best, that is a fact, but many companies have other AI providers for different reasons. I actually implemented an app that has both, working in parallel, so I can say that it's quite…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- Screen-share the task without guidance.
- Where do you first hesitate?
- What did you search for?
- Which error or concept is unclear?
- What workaround finally unblocked you?
Run the smallest experiment
Create the smallest example, diagnostic or setup assistant and observe three developers using it unprompted.
Three developers finish the task with fewer interventions or measurably less time.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.