Write the problem hypothesis
For [specific user], completing [job] is difficult because [missing capability], causing [measurable consequence].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.Still can't figure out how to get v3 to actually perform work.
Evidence observed in ruvnet/ruflo, a Coding project.
18 comments2 positive reactions237 days openProject Radar 100
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: First off, let me commend the contributors for an amazing, product, and from what I see in the v3 docs, this looks like a pretty fantastic rewrite. But to be honest, I've been very confused when trying to use v3. Should it have command compatibility with 2.7.x to some degree? I'm able to spawn a hive mind or start a…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Interview five affected users
- When did you last need this?
- What outcome were you trying to reach?
- What did you use instead?
- How often does this occur?
- What commitment would prove it matters?
Run the smallest experiment
Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.
A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.