Write the problem hypothesis
For [owner], the agent takes or proposes [action] without enough [visibility, approval or control], creating [risk].
You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.[Feature]: human in loop wanted
Evidence observed in agentscope-ai/agentscope, a General AI project.
17 comments0 positive reactions311 days openProject Radar 92
Featurestate/under-discussion
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
REPEATED ACROSS 2 PROJECTS
Related friction appears in 2 independent repositories. This is stronger than one backlog item, but still requires direct user validation.
Project strength and demand confidence are measured separately.SOURCE EVIDENCE
Read original GitHub Issue ↗Start with what users actually said
Reporter context: in my case, cli & pyqt & web, the react agent with python exec tool gives me the python code, i need to confirm the code, run it or refuse it or modify it. may work when run or modify the code, but if i refuse, the current agentscope doesnt work, because of no goto-like control of course, some condition check canbe…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.
Recruit: Recruit people who can show a recent, concrete example of the problem.
Guardrail: Measure behavior in the real workflow and keep a human review step for consequential actions.
Interview five people affected by this workflow
- Which action needs oversight?
- When should a human intervene?
- What evidence is needed to approve it?
- How is an action reversed?
- Who is accountable when it fails?
Run the smallest experiment
Insert one approval, audit or pause point into a live workflow and measure delay versus prevented risk.
Owners can explain, approve and reverse the action without blocking low-risk work.Measure behavior in the real workflow and keep a human review step for consequential actions.Make a build decision
- Build: repeated pain and active commitment
- Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
- Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Why this brief exists
Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.