← Back to Opportunity Radar
GUIDED VALIDATION BRIEF

feat: make promql 100%

Evidence observed in GreptimeTeam/greptimedb, a Research project.

8 comments2 positive reactions407 days openProject Radar 92
C-enhancement
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
DEMAND CONFIDENCE

REPEATED ACROSS 6 PROJECTS

Related friction appears in 6 independent repositories. This is stronger than one backlog item, but still requires direct user validation.

Project strength and demand confidence are measured separately.
SOURCE EVIDENCE

Start with what users actually said

Reporter context: What type of enhancement is this? User experience What does the enhancement do? how to: git clone [link] go build -o promql-compliance-tester ./cmd/promql-compliance-tester/ start greptime standalone ./promql-compliance-tester make promql 100% ref: #1042 for now: Implementation challenges No responseExcerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.

Read original GitHub Issue ↗
RESEARCH VALIDATION LENS

Recruit: Recruit people who can bring a recent literature, evidence-review or source-tracing task.

Guardrail: Measure citation accuracy, coverage and review time; never reward speed at the expense of source fidelity.

01 · Product Capability workflows

Write the problem hypothesis

For [specific user], completing [job] is difficult because [missing capability], causing [measurable consequence].

You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.
02 · EVIDENCE INTERVIEW

Interview five researchers, analysts or librarians

  • When did you last need this?
  • What outcome were you trying to reach?
  • What did you use instead?
  • How often does this occur?
  • What commitment would prove it matters?
At least three people independently describe the same painful workflow with recent examples.
03 · MINIMUM TEST

Run the smallest experiment

Deliver the outcome manually or with a narrow prototype before building a reusable feature.

A user completes the real workflow and commits time, data, distribution or budget to repeat it.Measure citation accuracy, coverage and review time; never reward speed at the expense of source fidelity.
04 · DECISION GATE

Make a build decision

  • Build: repeated pain and active commitment
  • Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
  • Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Do not let GitHub engagement replace direct validation.

Why this brief exists

Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.