← Back to Opportunity Radar
GUIDED VALIDATION BRIEF

[Bug] Memory is not working at all

Evidence observed in ruvnet/ruflo, a Coding project.

12 comments4 positive reactions406 days openProject Radar 95
Start free validation sprint4 guided steps · private notes · cloud sync
SOURCE EVIDENCE

Start with what users actually said

Reporter context: Still have no working memory in It's pretty unusable right now After trying with 5 hive-mind spawns i still get this output: Furthermore all my hive-mind spawns show the same status basically regardless of their progress: During the runs I can sometimes see successful outputs like this though: When I quit (Ctrl+C)…Excerpted from the public Issue. Read the complete thread before interpreting it.

Read original GitHub Issue ↗
01 · Memory & Data

Write the problem hypothesis

For [user], the agent loses or retrieves [information] incorrectly across [scope], causing [wrong action or repeated work].

You can name one user, one situation and one measurable consequence without proposing a feature.
02 · EVIDENCE INTERVIEW

Interview five affected users

  • Which information must persist?
  • For how long and within what scope?
  • Show the last wrong or missing recall.
  • What data must never cross boundaries?
  • How do you correct memory today?
At least three people independently describe the same painful workflow with recent examples.
03 · MINIMUM TEST

Run the smallest experiment

Test one constrained memory scope with a small real dataset and a written expected-recall benchmark.

The system retrieves the right evidence across repeated sessions without leaking or inventing context.
04 · DECISION GATE

Make a build decision

  • Build: repeated pain and active commitment
  • Narrow: pain is real but the audience or job differs
  • Stop: weak frequency or no behavioral proof
Do not let GitHub engagement replace direct validation.

Why this brief exists

Information has value only when it changes action. This page turns one public signal into a bounded validation exercise. It is a research aid, not proof of demand, investment advice or a product recommendation.