We scan public GitHub Issues for recurring requests, workflow friction and missing capabilities—then rank the strongest signals without hiding the original evidence.
53 signals · Last data refresh Oct 4, 2026, 8:41 PM UTC
“New” means first detected by the Radar within 48 hours. Live opportunities come only from projects in the current curated feed; archived projects remain searchable as historical research but cannot leave stale demand signals here.
A popular Issue can reveal real friction, but it does not prove willingness to pay. Use these leads for interviews, validation and product discovery.
Use the evidence as a starting point, then verify the problem before building.
Observed in calesthio/OpenMontage · Python · AGPL-3.0
What the reporter described: Hey Folks is there any support for hermes agent
Related friction appears in 9 independent repositories. This is stronger than one backlog item, but still requires direct user validation.
Observed in ZSeven-W/openpencil · Rust · MIT
What the reporter described: Problem codex和claude的审美不好，gemini模型的审美要好些 Proposed Solution 支持gemini模型，希望还可以支持google的stitch导入 Alternatives Considered No response Area None Additional Context No response
Related friction appears in 9 independent repositories. This is stronger than one backlog item, but still requires direct user validation.
The evidence score combines capped, diminishing-return discussion, positive reactions, unresolved duration and the underlying project’s Radar Score. This prevents one repeatedly commented thread from overwhelming independent signals. Maintenance-only tickets, dependency dashboards, CI failures and release checklists are filtered out. Rankings are independent and never paid placements.