bytedance/deer-flow vs bytedance/deer-flow
Based on the latest public GitHub metadata. No paid placement influences this comparison.
The two products are tied on the current Radar signal.
bytedance/deer-flow is categorized as Agent Infrastructure; bytedance/deer-flow is categorized as Agent Infrastructure. Compare their product descriptions and source repositories before choosing.
| Signal | bytedance/deer-flow | bytedance/deer-flow |
|---|---|---|
| Radar Score | 87/100 | 87/100 |
| Adoption | 25/25 | 25/25 |
| Maintenance | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| Project quality | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| Agent relevance | 20/20 | 20/20 |
| Demand evidence | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| Observed momentum | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| GitHub stars | 81,440 | 81,440 |
| Category | Agent Infrastructure | Agent Infrastructure |
bytedance/deer-flow
An open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.
Full analysisbytedance/deer-flow
An open-source long-horizon SuperAgent harness that researches, codes, and creates. With the help of sandboxes, memories, tools, skill, subagents and message gateway, it handles different levels of tasks that could take minutes to hours.
Full analysisTransparent scoring
Adoption (25 points) uses stars and forks, maintenance (20) uses code activity, quality (20) checks license and metadata, relevance (20) checks agent focus, demand (10) uses open Issues, and momentum (5) uses star growth.